Two pet-food databases, measured without double-counting.
HungryPets and PetFood use different schemas and contain overlapping catalogues. This report shows each store separately. It never adds product counts into a fictitious unique-product total.
Report queryLive bindings
Queried8 Sept 2026, 13:08 UTC
Deduplicated totalNot claimed
HungryPets D1
462 products
ProductsServing rows; databases overlap and are not added together
462100.0%
Ingredient / composition fieldPresence only; not a correctness or quality score
39585.5%
Any core nutrition fieldAt least one stored analytical field
41389.4%
Ingredient and nutrition fieldsBoth field groups present
39585.5%
Manufacturer URLURL presence; page may change after observation
40086.6%
Observed offer URLOffer rows are partial market observations
27994.9%
Observed offer priceNot current checkout or stock proof
6321.4%
PetFood D1
400 products
ProductsServing rows; databases overlap and are not added together
400100.0%
Ingredient / composition fieldPresence only; not a correctness or quality score
39999.8%
Any core nutrition fieldAt least one stored analytical field
34786.8%
Ingredient and nutrition fieldsBoth field groups present
34786.8%
Manufacturer URLURL presence; page may change after observation
400100.0%
Observed offer URLOffer rows are partial market observations
279100.0%
Observed offer priceNot current checkout or stock proof
10236.6%
What the counts say
Coverage is useful, but uneven.
The HungryPets store has 462 product rows. Ingredients are present on 395, while a nutrition field is present on 413. Calling all 413 “complete labels” would overstate the source.
Price coverage is much thinner than URL coverage: 63 of 294 HungryPets stock rows and 102 of 279 PetFood offer rows carry a price.
Limits
Field presence is not proof of correctness, current formulation, availability, nutritional adequacy or suitability. Product identity has not been deduplicated across the two stores.